DISCUSSION
PAPER
The Tasmanian Cultural Estate: A case for change
Author
Ray Norman
Ray Norman JTC (Syd Tech.), CA (National Art School Syd.), MA (Research) Monash Melb.
Independent Researcher, Designermaker & Cultural Geographer
Director & Project Coordinator (Tas) nudgebah institute
Foundation Member (Resigned) QVMAG Museum Governance Advisory Board
Status
Speculative and Unsolicited
Date: April 2015
Note: Highlighted text is hyperlinked to reference material
This paper explores ways to reimagine museum and art galleries' and our built heritage estate's governance and management in a 21st C context. Furthermore, it is clear that there are compelling reasons for fundamental change in regard to the governance and management of Tasmania's musingplaces and heritage properties.
With the appointment of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery's (TMAG) new Director and Chairman it appears that a new and welcomed trajectory has been embarked upon in the way 'museums' can be understood. Recently in the press Tasmania's Auditor General’s articulated concerns in regard to the TMAG’s governance and management.
In a contemporary context, public museums and art galleries are having to reimagine themselves in much the same way as newspapers, universities, publishers, etc. are having to. Looking ahead, the status quo is no longer a viable option and especially so in regard to Tasmanian Aboriginal people.
Moreover, Tasmanians have invested billions of dollars in their musingplaces and heritage properties. Somewhat curiously it can be argued that Tasmanians investment is vulnerable and faces various risks due to inadequacies and inconsistencies in their governance and management.
Moreover, Tasmanians have invested billions of dollars in their musingplaces and heritage properties. Somewhat curiously it can be argued that Tasmanians investment is vulnerable and faces various risks due to inadequacies and inconsistencies in their governance and management.
RECENT & RELATED PRESS
1. CLICK HERE
2. CLICK HERE
CONTENT: